Gallup

Employee Engagement – 5 Basic Steps

Posted in Communication, Employee Engagement, Gallup, Management, Performance on July 25th, 2010 by Barbara Brenner – Be the first to comment

It is no secret that fully engaged employees are those most likely to be long-term employees. They have made a personal commitment to the team, their managers, and the organization. They look forward to coming to work each day. They are fun to be around and they help generate a creative and cooperative mindset for their team. Because of this, they exert a powerful effect on the productivity and bottom-line of an organization. Clearly, this is a win-win situation, but how is it accomplished? It does not just happen by itself.

Research conducted by the Gallup Organization shows that world-class companies have the highest levels of employee engagement. They identified a group of 12 core elements that define successful employee engagement. Here are 5 basic steps to get you started and to help you increase your employee engagement quotient considerably.

1. Provide the right tools for them to do their job. Most times, employees will tell you what they need without you even having to ask. It might be a quieter work environment, more communication between departments, more frequent [or less frequent] meetings, specific guidance relating to the mission of the organization. Sometimes, you will only be able to rely on a core group of people to tell you the things you need to hear. Those are the ones with courage, vision, and an understanding of the pitfalls that may lie ahead in any team effort.

2. Utilize their best talents and drives. There is nothing more invigorating or stimulating for an employee than to be put in a position where they can utilize their strengths to have a positive effect on the team and on the company. An added benefit for them is to see their own personal growth and enhanced career objectives.

3. Praise worthy efforts. Why is this often forgotten? We become accustomed to getting top-notch performance from top performers – it becomes commonplace for us, and we begin to accept the fact that it is there on a daily basis. Do not let yourself be lulled into a feeling that this is business-as-usual, because it is not. Consider yourself extremely lucky to have tapped into these kinds of resources – and do not let it go unnoticed.

4. Build trust. Trust is the foundation upon which all solid relationships rest, and for which all ideas take on the shape of possibilities. If your intentions are suspect, you cannot move any project or idea forward. Resistance is intensified without trust, but with trust, all things are possible.

5. Listen. You should actively seek and encourage the views and ideas of your employees. Things can look very different from another tier in the organization. Many times, when people reach a certain level of management, they get stuck in a groove of what I call “in-the-box” thinking and they cannot see past that groove. Then, it is time to air out the cobwebs and view things from another perspective.

For additional understanding of the requirements for employee engagement, I suggest you look over the entire list of 12 core elements identified by the Gallup Organization [Q12].

http://www.gallup.com/

Search their site for “employee engagement”.

Note: This article was originally published at ezinearticles.com

Incoming search terms:

“FIRST, Break All the Rules: What the World’s Greatest Managers Do Differently”, by Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman

Posted in Book Review, Employee Engagement, Gallup, Leadership, Management on January 22nd, 2010 by Barbara Brenner – Be the first to comment

Part 2: The Wisdom of Great Managers

Marcus Buckingham & Curt Coffman sum up that wisdom very nicely in Chapter 2 of First, Break All the Rules: What the World’s Greatest Managers Do Differently, a core belief they heard echoed by tens of thousands of great managers.

People don’t change that much.
Don’t waste time trying to put in what was left out.
Try to draw out what was left in.
That is hard enough.

We all recognize that individuals are unique. They may have different ways of approaching the same problem or goal, and use different skills to get to the same endpoint. Ultimately, however, it is the responsibility of the manager to create the synergy between the employee’s goals and talents and the company’s objectives and bottom-line in the most effective, productive way.

According to Buckingham & Coffman, it is the manager’s duty to:

  • Find the right people
  • Set goals/expectations
  • Motivate the person
  • Develop the person

These are the most important duties a manager can perform and the accomplishment of these 4 goals will establish the credentials of a great manager.

It becomes fashionable sometimes to talk about leaderless organizations and the importance of team work in being in on the decision-making process, and I don’t disagree with getting input from the whole team. But it doesn’t work as an isolated decision-making system. One of the key elements of leading is to make sure you have all the information from all the right people, in order to then make an informed decision on which way to go.

The book discusses a failed attempt by a hotel industry executive, who believed [wrongly] that self-management teams would be an effective way to develop more and more skills in individuals. Instead, the employees could not concentrate on their particular fields of competence, since they were encouraged to get involved and familiar with as many other roles as possible. This created an atmosphere of uncertainty and denied them the feeling of core competence in their chosen lines. It was no longer possible to excel in their own field when emphasis was strictly on the team as a whole.

The leader needs to see the big picture, armed with information gathered from the team members — their managers. But all the cogs in the wheel [read workers] have to be able to each do their own part without being expected to manage others as well.

Not everyone wants to be a manager. Not everyone knows how to be a manager. Not everyone is fit to be a manager. One of the most interesting viewpoints I found in this book is this:

The most importance difference between a great manager and a great leader is one of focus. Great managers look inward. They look inside the company, into each individual, into the differences in style, goals, needs, and motivation of each person. These differences are small, subtle, but great managers need to pay attention to them. These subtle differences guide them toward the right way to release each person’s unique talents into performances.

Leaders focus outward on possible paths and directions and organizational strategies. But it is to the great manager that an employee shows commitment and dedication.

There are many more insights to be found within these pages, and this is a book to be read more than once, and used as a desk reference.

Incoming search terms:

“FIRST, Break All the Rules: What the World’s Greatest Managers Do Differently”, by Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman

Posted in Book Review, Employee Engagement, Gallup, Leadership, Management, Motivation, Organizational Leadership, Research, Study on January 5th, 2010 by Barbara Brenner – Be the first to comment

Part 1: Employee Engagement Research

First, Break All the Rules: What the World’s Greatest Managers Do Differently
is based on 2 Gallup Research Studies taken over the last 25 years. – the largest study of its kind ever undertaken. The first one zeroed in on Employee satisfaction and productivity, and asked “What Do the Most Talented Employees Need from their Workplace?” The answer was that talented employees needed great managers. Gallup recorded interviews with over 80,000 managers at different management levels, with different styles of managing, and a million employees, to find out the core attributes of great managers and employee performance.

Their findings regarding employee engagement are intriguing. One conclusion is that key employees do not fit a mold. You should not, and cannot, try to make them all behave the same. They bring their own core values and behaviors to the workplace, and each one contributes their own perspective and way of doing things. They may react differently to the same treatment. Thus, if you do not see them as individuals, with inclinations and behaviors formed by their unique selves, you may lose the best part of each of them.

If organizations view employee satisfaction as not being critical to the company’s success, consider these eye-opening facts stated by Gallup:

“Actively disengaged employees erode an organization’s bottom line while breaking the spirits of colleagues in the process. Within the U.S. workforce, Gallup estimates this cost to be more than $300 billion in lost productivity alone. In stark contrast, world-class organizations with an engagement ratio near 8:1 have built a sustainable model using our approach. As organizations move toward this benchmark, they greatly reduce the negative impact of actively disengaged employees while unleashing the organization’s potential for rapid growth.”

“Through rigorous research, we have identified 12 core elements – the Q12 — that link powerfully to key business outcomes. These 12 statements emerged as those that best predict employee and workgroup performance.”

In deference to the Gallup Organization, I won’t lay out those 12 elements here, but I provide a link from Gallup for you to uncover them yourself.

Employee Engagement Overview

Stay tuned for Part 2, where we’ll discuss Gallup’s research into great management.

Incoming search terms:

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline